My research project is situated at the vantage point, where the so-called »Brain Gain Thesis« has been put forward and widely discussed in the research literature regarding the development of modern neuroscience (here as one of several important examples of biomedical research) during the 20th century. This thesis is often understood in a rather uncritical way as the »growth« and »success« of scientific productivity in Anglo-Saxon countries since the Second World War, in particular due to the forced migration of Jewish and politically oppositional German scientists and doctors during the Third Reich. The research literature has all too often looked at the intellectual, academic and institutional dimensions of forced migration in medicine and science alone, yet all too rarely addressed the individual fate and adjustment problems of many émigré psychiatrists and neurologists - i.e. the cohort that builds the main subject of my historical investigations.

My research project focuses primarily on the group of émigré doctors and scientists who went to the USA and Canada, where most of them stayed even after the end of the Second World War. The thesis that I want to examine and critically discuss here refers in particular to the fact that the process of forced migration has often resulted in drastic challenges and changes in the career plans and prospects of the respective individuals. With a view to the examined historical data and sources, it is attempted to show that the »Brain Gain Thesis« needs to be significantly revised. Such a change of perspective affects both the methodology of understanding the internationalization of medical research as well as the methodology of forced migration studies.

During my time at the Bad Homburg Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities (»Forschungskolleg Humanwissenschaften«), the (post-review) revision of my English book manuscript with the above-named title is envisaged - the manuscript has currently been submitted to a North American university press and is subject to an external peer review process. (Frank W. Stahnisch)